- Introduction
- Purpose
- Scope
- Responsibility
- Methodology
- Equipment, Chemicals, Glasswares, Documents
- Working Standard Details & Verification Sample Details
- Method of Analysis
- Description of Verification Parameters
- Verification parameters and acceptance criteria
- Specificity
- Linearity
- Accuracy
- Precision
- Summary
- Conclusions
- Assessing selected analytical performance characteristics to generate appropriate, relevant data rather than repeating the validation process.
- Method verification consists of partial validation. It should be performed for already validated analytical methods under the following circumstances:
- when an already validated method is used on a product for the first time (e.g. in case of a change in active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) supplier, change in the method of synthesis or after reformulation of a drug product).
- when an already validated method is used for the first time in a laboratory (in some cases, method transfer may be preferable).
- This document established the method selection & procedures for verification of standard method performance. The laboratory shall confirm that it can properly operate standard methods before introducing the tests or calibrations. If the standard method changes, the verification shall be repeated.
- Verification that a laboratory can adequately operate a standard method requires that the laboratory provide objective evidence the performance parameters specified in the test method have been met with the matrices to which the method is being applied. Most often, the critical requirements are accuracy and precision (generally accepted as repeatability and reproducibility) which are reflected in the measurement uncertainty. The objective evidence is the accuracy and precision obtained from actual lab data.
- The scope of verification of the analytical procedure for Accuracy, Precision, Specificity & Linearity is to demonstrate that the method is suitable for the analysis of Azithromycin Tablets USP 500 mg.
- It is the responsibility of the validation officer to ensure that the finished product analysis method is verified as per U.S. Pharmacopoeia.
- It is the responsibility of the QC Executive to follow the verified method for routine analysis.
- The Manager - Q.C, should ensure that methods of analysis are available and that the equipment to be used for analysis is properly working and calibrated.
- The Q.A. Manager should ensure that the method verified for the finished product should meet the acceptance criteria and maintain records for further activity.
Equipment | ||||
HPLC | : |
| ||
Instrument ID & Calibration Date |
| |||
Analytical Balance | : | An analytical balance is sufficiently sensitive to detect changes of 0.1 mg. | ||
Instrument ID & Calibration Date |
| |||
pH Meter | : |
| ||
Instrument ID & Calibration Date |
| |||
Chemicals | ||||
Methanol (HPLC Grade) | : |
| ||
Acetonitrile (HPLC Grade) | : |
| ||
Dipotassium Hydrogen Orthophosphate | : |
| ||
Sodium 1 - Octane Sulfonate | : |
| ||
Monobasic Ammonium Phosphate | : |
| ||
Glassware | ||||
Volumetric Flasks | : |
| ||
Pipettes | : |
| ||
Beakers | : |
| ||
Other Glassware | : |
| ||
Documents | ||||
Standard Operating Procedure | : |
| ||
Calibration Documents | : | |||
Guidelines | : | (1226) Verification of Compendial Procedures |
Working Standard Used | ||
Azithromycin Dihydrate USP | ||
Reference No. | : |
|
LOD | : |
|
Purity (as is basis) | : |
|
Prepared on | : |
|
Valid up to | : |
|
Sample Taken for Verification | ||
Name of Sample | : | Azithromycin Tablets USP 500 mg |
Batch Number | : |
|
Manufacturing Date | : |
|
Expiry Date | : |
|
- System precision: To check system suitability criteria
- Repeatability should be assessed using a minimum of nine determinations covering the specified range for the procedure, e.g. three concentrations/three replicates each, or a minimum of six determinations at 100% of the test concentration.
- Intermediate precision expresses within laboratory variations (usually on different days, different analysts and different equipment).
Serial Number | Sample Identification | Result |
1. | 80% |
|
2. | 90% |
|
3. | 100% |
|
4. | 110% |
|
5. | 120% |
|
Correlation Coefficient (R2) |
|
Sr. No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Result |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
| ||||
% RSD |
|
|
Sr. No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Result |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
| ||||
% RSD |
|
|
Details | Repeatability | Intermediate Precision |
Analyst |
|
|
Date |
|
|
% Assay of Azithromycin | |
Repeatability |
|
Intermediate Precision |
|
AVERAGE |
|
SD |
|
% RSD |
|